Judicial precedents, also known as case law or judge-made law, play a significant role in the legal system of Pakistan. They are decisions made by higher courts that establish legal principles and interpretations of the law, which lower courts are bound to follow. These precedents provide guidance and consistency in the application of the law and contribute to the development of the legal system in Pakistan.
Ad
The judicial system in Pakistan is based on English common law principles, inherited from the British colonial era. The hierarchy of courts in Pakistan consists of the Supreme Court, High Courts, and subordinate courts. The Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in the country and has the power to make binding precedents on all other courts.
The judicial system in Pakistan is based on English common law principles, inherited from the British colonial era. The hierarchy of courts in Pakistan consists of the Supreme Court, High Courts, and subordinate courts. The Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in the country and has the power to make binding precedents on all other courts.
Ad
One of the most important principles governing judicial precedents in Pakistan is stare decisis, which means "to stand by things decided." This principle requires lower courts to follow and apply the legal principles established by higher courts in similar cases. Stare decisis ensures consistency, predictability, and fairness in the administration of justice.
One of the most important principles governing judicial precedents in Pakistan is stare decisis, which means "to stand by things decided." This principle requires lower courts to follow and apply the legal principles established by higher courts in similar cases. Stare decisis ensures consistency, predictability, and fairness in the administration of justice.
Ad
The Supreme Court of Pakistan has issued numerous landmark judgments that have had a significant impact on the legal landscape of the country. These judgments have covered a wide range of legal issues, including constitutional matters, human rights, criminal law, administrative law, and commercial law.
The Supreme Court of Pakistan has issued numerous landmark judgments that have had a significant impact on the legal landscape of the country. These judgments have covered a wide range of legal issues, including constitutional matters, human rights, criminal law, administrative law, and commercial law.
Ad
One notable example is the case of Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan vs. Federation of Pakistan (1955), which dealt with constitutional issues related to parliamentary democracy and fundamental rights. In this case, the Supreme Court held that any amendment to the Constitution that affects its basic structure or fundamental rights must be passed by a two-thirds majority in both houses of Parliament.
One notable example is the case of Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan vs. Federation of Pakistan (1955), which dealt with constitutional issues related to parliamentary democracy and fundamental rights. In this case, the Supreme Court held that any amendment to the Constitution that affects its basic structure or fundamental rights must be passed by a two-thirds majority in both houses of Parliament.
Ad
Another important precedent is the case of Shehla Zia vs. WAPDA (1994), which addressed gender discrimination in employment. The Supreme Court ruled that women cannot be denied employment opportunities solely based on their gender and that any discriminatory practices must be struck down.
Another important precedent is the case of Shehla Zia vs. WAPDA (1994), which addressed gender discrimination in employment. The Supreme Court ruled that women cannot be denied employment opportunities solely based on their gender and that any discriminatory practices must be struck down.
Ad
In recent years, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has also played a crucial role in addressing issues of corruption and accountability. The case of Nawaz Sharif vs. National Accountability Bureau (2019) is a notable example. In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the disqualification of the former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on charges of corruption, setting an important precedent for holding public officials accountable.
In recent years, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has also played a crucial role in addressing issues of corruption and accountability. The case of Nawaz Sharif vs. National Accountability Bureau (2019) is a notable example. In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the disqualification of the former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on charges of corruption, setting an important precedent for holding public officials accountable.
.jpeg)
No comments:
Post a Comment